The first two seasons are perfect. Literally like the best show ever. CINEMATIC MASTERPIECE. Dont listen to the shitty reviews they literally just have bad taste, watch it for yourself and see, you wont be dissapointed. _(im iffy so far on the 3rd season which is unfortunate as im sooo fond of the f... The first two seasons are perfect. Literally like the best show ever. CINEMATIC MASTERPIECE. Dont listen to the shitty reviews they literally just have bad taste, watch it for yourself and see, you wont be dissapointed. _(im iffy so far on the 3rd season which is unfortunate as im sooo fond of the first 2, but i think they were going for a total switch up and a campy comedy, which is true to the book, The Vampire Lestat, and true to the stark and jarring difference going from reading the first book to the second... So im here for the ride lol)_

Just another woke crap coming from Holywood. Didn't expect anything good from them nowadays...

So this is one of those titles that IMDb will remove your review if it's not positively glowing. I'm not sure why, the source material was already really progressive. It was essentially a story about two Gay men who happen to be vampires... and their violent break up. But it was subtle, it was artis... So this is one of those titles that IMDb will remove your review if it's not positively glowing. I'm not sure why, the source material was already really progressive. It was essentially a story about two Gay men who happen to be vampires... and their violent break up. But it was subtle, it was artistic, and it had more of a story to tell about good and evil among other things. Subtle is the key, because in the 2022 version, there is nothing subtle or artistic. Vampires can't have sex in the novels to up the sexual tension and angst. In this title I guess they didn't think it would be woke enough if it wasn't 9 and 1/2 Weeks with Vampires. And then they changed Louis, which means that they had to change the entire timeline of the title, and that caused a little bit of complications with everything else, because even though there was a strong message about freeing his slaves in the book... they couldn't have it in the movie... ...Because when you are woke things don't need to make any sense. And they aged Claudia up, and that presented significant changes and relieved some of what made her character so compelling. In the end they took a beautiful novel and turned it into cheap fan fiction porn with politics and the people are eating it up. Because in this day and age, you can't respect the source material, you have to trash it.

I have read Anne Rice's vampire novels, not all of them but enough to get a clear impression of her writing style, characterisations and settings for her work. Interview with the Vampire, for me, largely misses the mark on each and every count.The characters don't feel like the Rice's, they lack the... I have read Anne Rice's vampire novels, not all of them but enough to get a clear impression of her writing style, characterisations and settings for her work. Interview with the Vampire, for me, largely misses the mark on each and every count.The characters don't feel like the Rice's, they lack the personality and finesse, she infused her characters with. The time period/setting is in many respects, off the mark, too. Worse still, there's is politic's infused into this work. There's a dash of rather obvious negative Russian messaging and yet more woke-ism, I personally, could have done without. Acting is of a high standard. I feel its a genuine shame so much else is off. This could have worked if they had paid closer attention to Rice's actual work and knocked off the unwelcome messaging. In short, high production values and decent acting can't save this series from feeling, to this fan at least, nothing like Rice's work. The movie with Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise from the 90's, beautifully captures the essence of Rice's work and is my recommended screen adaptation.