Starts out good but gets weirdly bad, at least to me. Concept is interesting but it was unexpectedly slow and I lost interest in the plot.

**3/10** - Maybe if it was a YouTube video it would've been respected more. Not sure why some reviews say that this is "faithful" and "not just jumpscares", because that's not fully accurate; It very much operates like a standard A24 horror movie. That's not to say that they do a bad job, but you ca... **3/10** - Maybe if it was a YouTube video it would've been respected more. Not sure why some reviews say that this is "faithful" and "not just jumpscares", because that's not fully accurate; It very much operates like a standard A24 horror movie. That's not to say that they do a bad job, but you can tell that this was made by, and made for, people that grew up with FNAF and the backrooms themed cheap game adaptions. It's pretty unrelated to the concept of the backrooms from the original 4chan postings. Sure, the writers may have tied in some deep easter eggs here and there that somewhat show that they did their pop culture "research", but even that is a depature from the source material. You can just skip around and watch the found footage parts for the scenary and visuals which is mostly pretty great, save for the injection of fnaf vibe monsters. If you appreciate the scenary, concept and vagueness of the original source material from 4chan, you can probably just find all the relevant clips already on YouTube; watching this is unecessary for that.

**Score: 3/10 — An Engaging Walk to Nowhere** I don't like movies that go nowhere, don't make any sense, or lack an actual ending. And *Backrooms*? It's the poster child for all three. I feel like I've wasted a part of my life that I will never get back... time that could have been better spent wa... **Score: 3/10 — An Engaging Walk to Nowhere** I don't like movies that go nowhere, don't make any sense, or lack an actual ending. And *Backrooms*? It's the poster child for all three. I feel like I've wasted a part of my life that I will never get back... time that could have been better spent watching a different movie. The concept is solid. Kane Parsons, the 20-year-old director behind the viral YouTube series, brings the internet's favourite liminal space nightmare to the big screen. Chiwetel Ejiofor plays Clark, a failed architect and struggling furniture store owner who discovers a doorway in his basement to an infinite labyrinth of yellow walled, fluorescent lit rooms. Renate Reinsve plays his therapist, Mary, who follows him in. The production design is genuinely impressive the Backrooms feel unsettlingly real and deeply disorienting. But that's where the praise ends. **Having said that, the movie was engaging and I didn't realise that I didn't like it 'til the credits rolled.** I was invested, the atmosphere is thick, the dread is palpable, and Ejiofor's performance is committed. The first 70 minutes deliver exactly what you'd hope: eerie corridors, unsettling silence, and a creeping sense that reality itself is unravelling . Then the film loses its footing. The momentum shifts, the tension dissipates, and the narrative attempts to add meaning without committing to anything concrete. Clark explains that the Backrooms "misremembers" people, creating imperfect replicas of reality. The monster, revealed as a distorted, pirate costumed version of Clark himself, kills him in a moment that lands with a dull thud. Mary escapes, or does she? The final shot shows a malformed replica of Mary slumped in an interrogation chair, and we're left with ambiguity that feels more like creative cowardice than artistic choice. It's the kind of ending that thinks it's being clever but is really just being lazy. The film offers no solutions, no rules, no answers, just a mountain of unanswered questions and an audience that's stopped caring. I was left with... well, nothing. No resolution, no catharsis, no desire to ever revisit this world. Many viewers share this frustration, audience reviews are split, with some praising the atmosphere and others decrying the hollow, confused ending. It earns its 3 points for the production values, which ain't half bad. The set design, cinematography, and Ejiofor's performance deserve some credit. But the story goes nowhere, the ending is empty, and the experience left me feeling cheated. I could have spent those 105 minutes on something that actually respected my time.

humm well. The epilouge spoils any surprise of what the backrooms is, the therapist patient thing is kind of naff. its unclear who the main character is. I think they tied the Clark character too much to the backrooms, where it should have been its own character. some unsettling moments, but overall... humm well. The epilouge spoils any surprise of what the backrooms is, the therapist patient thing is kind of naff. its unclear who the main character is. I think they tied the Clark character too much to the backrooms, where it should have been its own character. some unsettling moments, but overall the writing let it down. some nice creppy surreal imagery, but the imposed story of Clark took over. Would have been better as pure horror atmosphere, where the mysteries of the backrooms reveal themselves as the characters travel through them. Clarks family drama just detracted from this. Its a pity, could have been better Im afraid.. The therapist back story was so unclear what it actually meant. I didn't really care for them.

This is genuinely unsettling. It's a lovely premise and it is well executed. It is creepy and unsettling and weird. It's the things you want out of this kind of horror and this movie pulls it off well. The cast is superb, the direction is great, the use of this concept and its associated effects is executed flawlessly. For what this is, it is just great.

I'll start by saying I'm not a hater; I wanted to enjoy it, I really did. But I think some scriptwriting decisions were made that really hurt the final result. I'll begin with the scene where they discover the backrooms. While the opening scene is interesting, the scene where the protagonist finds t... I'll start by saying I'm not a hater; I wanted to enjoy it, I really did. But I think some scriptwriting decisions were made that really hurt the final result. I'll begin with the scene where they discover the backrooms. While the opening scene is interesting, the scene where the protagonist finds them is not. Having a clear exit point significantly reduces the tension for him. He controls the space, he's oriented, and he doesn't seem lost or confused by having to take paths he wouldn't choose if fleeing the creature. He quickly finds his way back. This sequence evokes so little fear that the protagonist even goes back to grab a stool. (He's not afraid of the place; he controls it.) For the viewer, this provides a certain sense of reassurance, since this is the character we've been following since the beginning of the film, and he's the one we fear or worry about as viewers. Regarding the character's development, it's true he displays a certain amount of resentment and simmering anger toward his ex-wife, but the character ultimately commits actions (decapitating Kat) that are implausible given how his psychology had been established up to that point. He isn't portrayed as aggressive, especially not toward others. I think it would have worked better as an opening film to introduce this place through the eyes of people who had no control over the situation. Perhaps a more slasher-like approach: a group of kids who get lost, become frightened, start fighting amongst themselves, unease and distrust grow, and little by little they are attacked or killed in front of their helpless companions who do everything they can to find a way out. The character introductions are rather slow, and this doesn't significantly change anything as the plot progresses. In addition, they explain the strange creatures before showing the "final" creature, making it more understandable for the viewer and, at the same time, much less aberrant or terrifying than it could have been. Some things are "planted" in the film, but I think they're underdeveloped, perhaps in anticipation of a sequel or turning it into a saga. I consider this reasonable given the potential of the original idea, but at the same time, I don't think it's the best introduction for viewers unfamiliar with this "universe." That said, I'll add that the version on YouTube seemed a thousand times better; it creates a more disturbing, confusing, and interesting atmosphere than this film. I hope many of you enjoyed it, but for me, it wasn't even half of what I had hoped for. It fell short.

Hmmm. Perhaps I just wasn't in the mood, but I really didn't get what the fuss was about with this. "Clark" (Chiwitel Ejiofor) is a recently divorced man who has big dreams but who is reduced to running (and sleeping in) his cheap and cheerful "Ottoman Empire" furniture emporium in small town Americ... Hmmm. Perhaps I just wasn't in the mood, but I really didn't get what the fuss was about with this. "Clark" (Chiwitel Ejiofor) is a recently divorced man who has big dreams but who is reduced to running (and sleeping in) his cheap and cheerful "Ottoman Empire" furniture emporium in small town America. The electrics in his store start playing up and upon investigation he is intrigued by a glimmer of light that appears to be emenating from beneath the basement wall! Investigating, he discovers that there is a mysterious portal into a construction that has something of an Escher drawing straight from the mind of Lewis Carroll to it. He tries to explain this discovery to his sceptical therapist (Renate Reinsve) but she thinks he's lost the plot so he engages the help of two of his employees "Kat" (Lukita Maxwell) and her boyfriend "Bobby" (Finn Bennett) to film his next exploration - and that's when they discover that all in this new dimension is not so very friendly. Meantime, his shrink "Mary" makes a visit to her patient's showroom only to discover the same portal. Is she going to be daft enough to walk through the wall into the unknown? There is some attempt made at the end to tie up the spurious threads but for the most part I found this to be really quite a dull and unmenacing affair that is hand-held filmed in a style of "Blair Witch" to try and immerse us in it's mystery but that more often than not relies on increasingly hysterical dialogue and a great deal of beige paint to create some sense of menace. Kane Parsons presided over a decent idea for about twenty minutes, but thereafter is all just fizzled out into a repetitious short-story of a film that I felt was overstretched.

Well, that was interesting. This is a well made horror-drama released by A24 that, to my surprise, nabbed $81 million in its opening weekend. Both Chiwetel Ejiofor and Renate Reinsve give solid performances and while a few moments lost my attention, there are few great scenes particularly towards the end. Don't know where the hype came from but good for this (and Obsession) for capturing the mainstream audiences. **3.75/5**

New unofficial Christmas movie unlocked. Far more complex than I thought it was going to be, especially considering it was a combination of trauma based creatures and a touch of sci-fi uncertainty. Overall a good watch, and incredibly impressive from such a young creative mind.

Anointing a young, first-time big screen director as the new filmmaking messiah of his or her particular genre is a risky undertaking, to be sure. Does the fledgling auteur have what it takes to live up to that auspicious title? Is this an ordination that’s truly warranted? It’s serious business... Anointing a young, first-time big screen director as the new filmmaking messiah of his or her particular genre is a risky undertaking, to be sure. Does the fledgling auteur have what it takes to live up to that auspicious title? Is this an ordination that’s truly warranted? It’s serious business, both for box office tallies and artistically speaking. But does the heir apparent truly possess the skills, talent and vision to achieve success on both fronts? That’s something worth considering in light of the debut feature from writer-director Kane Parsons, the force behind this aspiring smart horror release, which is quickly being praised to the hilt and drawing huge numbers in ticket sales. However, I believe that the coronation of this new voice in the genre is far from deserved and entirely premature. While it’s true that Parsons has a keen eye for the aesthetic, that’s only half the challenge when making a movie in virtually any genre. The other part – being an effective storyteller – needs work (and a lot of it). Based on a YouTube adaptation of his immensely popular internet TV series The Backrooms, the film follows a troubled (and largely unsuccessful) seller of cheap furniture, Clark (Chiwetel Ejiofor), who’s experiencing difficulties in his personal life and professional calling. His failed marriage and inability to make use of his training as an architect have led him to seek counseling from a high-profile therapist, Dr. Mary Kline (Renate Reinsve). His progress takes a drastic turn, though, when he finds a maze of what appears to be a collection of office suites adjacent to his store’s basement – a discovery he makes by somehow walking through one of its walls. The spaces are seemingly devoid of people but haphazardly strewn with various items from his life, including his past. Has he stepped into a corporeal manifestation of his psyche? An alternate reality? Or something else entirely? That’s what he hopes to learn with the unexpected help of his skeptical shrink. And what will that be? The film’s opening half capably sets the scene, creating a legitimately sinister sense of creepiness. However, about midway into the picture, it becomes repetitive and directionless, as if it’s searching for what to do next. That’s where this offering goes off the rails, turning inexplicable, underdeveloped and outright goofy at times. The alleged scariness of this would-be psychological thriller vanishes, turning tedious, silly and more laughable than frightening. And a last-ditch effort to take the narrative in a redemptive direction involving a mysterious scientific research organization only muddies the waters further, doing little to salvage what has already fallen apart. Many have likened this release to a video game with a protagonist trying to solve the puzzle of the story. Others have said that it’s full of nuanced references to the YouTube series, although that would require an intimate knowledge of the source material to fully appreciate it. And others still have postulated a host of other interpretations given the inherently vague nature of the finished product. For my money, even though it starts out well, it turns into an incoherent cinematic mess that fails to hold attention and left me sighing a big “So what?” What became most apparent to me while sitting through this is just how difficult it is to create an engaging smart horror film, a genre I enjoy immensely but has been plagued by more failures than successes, with this one being yet another entry on that list of disappointments. Indeed, don’t be too quick to reach for that crown just yet. If the filmmaker hopes to assume that title, he’s still got his work cut out for him, beginning with an urgent need to get out of his own “Backrooms.”